The YoungFamilyLife essay Freud's Structural Model for Frontline Family Support: Understanding the Unintegrated Legacy of Early Infancy explored how the id, ego, and superego framework illuminates the psychological dynamics that frontline family support workers encounter daily (Young, 2025). Freud's framework, developed through clinical observation in late 19th and early 20th century Vienna, offered a revolutionary map of internal psychological conflict. Yet for all its explanatory power, Freud's work remained firmly rooted in what happened within the individual psyche, inferred through the analyst's interpretation of free association, dreams, and slips of the tongue.
Between Freud's death in 1939 and Eric Berne's development of Transactional Analysis in the 1950s and 60s, psychology underwent a profound transformation. What had been a largely speculative, theoretical enterprise began its evolution into empirical science. A generation of researchers and clinicians—many trained in psychoanalytic traditions, some deeply critical of Freud's methods and conclusions—shifted the focus from unobservable intrapsychic processes to measurable, observable phenomena. They moved from asking "What drives and conflicts shape this person's unconscious?" to "What patterns can we observe in how people actually relate to one another?"
This wasn't simply methodological preference. It represented a fundamental reconceptualisation of human psychology itself—from the individual mind as the primary unit of analysis to the relationship as the crucible in which personality forms, develops, and either thrives or becomes disordered.
Freud had proposed that human behaviour was fundamentally driven by internal forces—the libido's pursuit of pleasure, the death drive's pull toward destruction, and the resulting conflicts between primitive desires and civilised constraints. Early relationships mattered in Freud's schema, certainly, but primarily as sources of gratification or frustration of these innate drives. The Oedipus complex, for instance, described an internal psychosexual drama, not a pattern of actual parent-child interaction.
The first significant challenge to this drive-based model came from within psychoanalysis itself. Melanie Klein, working in the 1920s-40s, pioneered psychoanalytic work with young children and developed object relations theory (Klein, 1932). Where Freud had focused on drives seeking discharge, Klein emphasised the infant's relationship with "objects"—initially the mother, specifically the breast. She proposed that infants develop complex internal representations of these early relationships, splitting experiences into "good" and "bad" objects as a way of managing overwhelming anxiety (Klein, 1946).
Klein's work was controversial—she proposed extraordinarily sophisticated internal fantasy life for infants, and her interpretation methods were subjective even by psychoanalytic standards. Yet her fundamental insight proved generative: perhaps human beings are primarily motivated not by drive discharge but by the need to establish and maintain relationships with others. Perhaps personality structure forms not through managing internal drives but through internalising patterns from early relationships.
This relational emphasis developed further through the British Object Relations School. Ronald Fairbairn (1952) rejected Freud's drive theory entirely, proposing instead that "libido is object-seeking, not pleasure-seeking." Human beings, in Fairbairn's view, are fundamentally motivated by the need for relationships, not by the need to discharge tension. Donald Winnicott introduced concepts that remain central to contemporary practice: the "good enough mother" who adapts to her infant's needs without requiring perfection; the "holding environment" that provides both security and space for development; and the distinction between true self (authentic spontaneity) and false self (compliant adaptation to others' expectations) (Winnicott, 1960, 1965).
These theorists remained within the psychoanalytic tradition, exploring the internal world through clinical work. But they were already shifting the conversation—from Freud's hydraulic metaphors of damming and redirecting drives to something more recognisably human: infants seeking connection, caregivers responding with greater or lesser sensitivity, and internal structures forming through the internalisation of these relationship patterns.
The decisive break from drive theory came from John Bowlby, a British psychiatrist and psychoanalyst whose work in the 1950s-70s fundamentally transformed developmental psychology (Bowlby, 1969, 1973, 1980). Bowlby's genius was to step outside psychoanalytic assumptions entirely and look at infants through the lens of ethology—the study of animal behaviour in natural environments—and evolutionary biology.
Bowlby proposed that human infants come into the world with an innate attachment behavioural system, shaped by millions of years of evolution. Proximity to a protective caregiver meant survival; separation meant danger and potential death. The attachment system—visible in behaviours like crying, clinging, following, and protest at separation—wasn't about drive satisfaction or fantasy. It was about survival. The quality of the infant's attachment to their primary caregiver would shape not only early development but patterns of relating throughout life (Bowlby, 1969).
This was revolutionary for several reasons. First, Bowlby insisted on studying real interactions between real parents and children, not fantasies inferred from adult patients' free associations. Second, he integrated insights from evolutionary biology, ethology, and control systems theory, positioning psychology within the broader sciences. Third, he made testable predictions about how variations in early caregiving would produce measurable differences in children's behaviour and development.
The psychoanalytic establishment resisted fiercely. Bowlby's emphasis on actual relationship quality seemed to dismiss the internal fantasy world that psychoanalysts considered primary. His focus on observable behaviour looked like behaviourism to those who valued depth psychology. The Kleinian analyst who supervised Bowlby's early work told him he was wasting his time observing mothers and babies—he should be analysing his own unconscious reactions instead (Holmes, 1993).
But Bowlby persisted, and his theory gained powerful empirical support through the work of Mary Ainsworth. In the 1960s-70s, Ainsworth developed the Strange Situation procedure—a laboratory paradigm for observing how infants respond to brief separations from and reunions with their caregivers (Ainsworth et al., 1978). Her research identified distinct patterns: secure attachment (distress at separation, comfort upon reunion), anxious-avoidant attachment (apparent indifference to separation and reunion), and anxious-resistant attachment (extreme distress at separation, difficulty being comforted upon reunion).
These weren't theoretical constructs inferred from clinical interpretation. They were observable, measurable, reproducible patterns. Different researchers in different laboratories could achieve reliable agreement about which pattern a given infant displayed. Moreover, these patterns predicted later outcomes—social competence, capacity to regulate emotion, quality of peer relationships, even romantic attachment patterns in adulthood (Sroufe et al., 2005).
Psychology had moved from speculation to science. The internal world that Freud had mapped through inference now had observable correlates in actual behaviour. The drives Freud had proposed as primary motivators appeared secondary to something more fundamental: the human need for secure attachment.
Whilst British psychoanalysts were developing object relations theory and Bowlby was formulating attachment theory, an independent but parallel development was occurring in American psychiatry. Harry Stack Sullivan proposed that personality exists only in the context of interpersonal relationships (Sullivan, 1953). His famous dictum—"The self is made up of reflected appraisals"—suggested that we come to know ourselves entirely through how others respond to us.
Sullivan rejected the notion that personality could be understood by examining the individual in isolation. Psychological problems weren't internal conflicts between psychic structures but patterns of interaction that developed when anxiety disrupted interpersonal relationships. Therapy wasn't about making the unconscious conscious but about examining and modifying dysfunctional interaction patterns (Sullivan, 1954).
This interpersonal psychiatry tradition would prove crucial for Eric Berne. Where classical psychoanalysis focused on what happened on the couch between analyst and patient, Sullivan had shown that personality manifested in the transaction—the actual exchange between people. Not what someone thought or felt privately, but what they did in relationship to others.
When Eric Berne began developing Transactional Analysis in the 1950s, he was working in a radically transformed landscape. Object relations theory had shifted focus from drives to relationships. Attachment theory had demonstrated that observable relationship patterns in early life predicted later psychological functioning. Interpersonal psychiatry had shown that personality existed in the space between people, not just within them.
Berne's contribution was to synthesise these developments into a framework that made psychoanalytic concepts accessible, observable, and immediately applicable (Berne, 1961). Where Freud's id, ego, and superego were theoretical constructs inferred from clinical material, Berne's Parent, Adult, and Child ego states could be observed directly in how people communicated. Where Freud's theory required years of specialist training to apply, Berne's framework could be taught to patients themselves—indeed, he wrote his popular book Games People Play (Berne, 1964) explicitly for a general audience.
This accessibility sometimes led critics to dismiss TA as superficial or reductive. But Berne wasn't simply dumbing down psychoanalysis. He was doing what Ainsworth had done for Bowlby—taking theoretical insights about internal psychological structures and identifying their observable manifestations in actual behaviour. The Parent ego state wasn't just the superego renamed; it was the observable communication stance when someone speaks from internalised authority. The Child ego state wasn't just the id; it was recognisable patterns learned in childhood relationships (Stewart & Joines, 1987).
For frontline family support workers, this transformation from speculation to observation matters profoundly. You cannot see someone's superego. You cannot measure their libido. You cannot observe their unconscious fantasies without extensive clinical training and subjective interpretation. But you can observe when someone shifts from Adult to Critical Parent in mid-conversation. You can recognise when a family member's Adapted Child response reflects anxious attachment patterns. You can identify the repetitive transaction patterns—the "games" in Berne's terminology—that maintain dysfunction despite everyone's stated desire for change.
The transformation from Freud's intrapsychic model to Berne's observable transactions occurred through a series of conceptual and methodological advances. The following timeline maps this evolution:
Method: Clinical inference from individual analysis, drive-based theory
Influence: Shifted focus from drives to relationships, but remained within subjective psychoanalytic method
Influence: Theoretical foundation for relationship-centred psychology
Influence: Clinical concepts directly applicable to family support practice
Influence: Made developmental psychology empirical and testable
Influence: Empirical validation that relationship patterns are observable and consequential
Influence: Direct precursor to Berne's transactional focus
Synthesis: Combined object relations insights, attachment understanding, and interpersonal focus into observable, applicable model
The Pattern of Progress:
This progression represents psychology's maturation from speculation to science, whilst retaining psychoanalytic insights about how early experience shapes later functioning. Berne didn't reject Freud—he translated him into empirically grounded, practically applicable terms.
Berne's Parent-Adult-Child model both honours and transforms Freud's id-ego-superego framework. Understanding the correspondences and crucial differences clarifies what Berne achieved:
| Freud's Structure | Berne's Ego State | Key Reinterpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Superego | Parent | From internal moral authority to observable communication stance Freud: Internalised parental prohibitions and ideals; unconscious moral judgment Berne: Observable voice and posture when speaking from internalised authority figures; recognisable in tone, word choice, body language Critical difference: Berne's Parent includes both Critical Parent (prohibitions, "shoulds") and Nurturing Parent (care, protection)—expanding beyond Freud's purely prohibitive superego |
| Ego | Adult | From executive mediator to reality-processing state Freud: The rational manager negotiating between id, superego, and external reality; primarily defensive function Berne: The here-and-now information processor; assesses current reality without contamination from past patterns or parental injunctions Critical difference: Berne's Adult isn't defensive or mediating—it's simply processing current data rationally, as a computer would |
| Id | Child | From primitive drives to learned childhood patterns Freud: Unconscious repository of instinctual drives (libido, aggression); pleasure-seeking, immediate gratification Berne: Observable patterns from actual childhood—both spontaneous feelings (Free/Natural Child) and learned adaptations to authority (Adapted Child) Critical difference: Berne's Child isn't primarily about drives but about retained ways of being from childhood experience; it can be creative, joyful, and spontaneous (Free Child) or compliant/rebellious (Adapted Child) |
The Fundamental Shift: From Theory to Observation
This comparison reveals Berne's methodological revolution:
Why This Matters for Frontline Practice
When working with families, you cannot access Freud's theoretical constructs without years of psychoanalytic training and prolonged therapeutic relationships. But you can immediately observe:
Berne made the unconscious visible. Not through interpretation, but through attention to how people actually communicate.
Integration, Not Replacement
Importantly, Berne didn't reject Freud's insights about how early experience creates internal structures. The Parent ego state is built from internalised authority figures, just as the superego is. The Child ego state does contain primitive emotional responses, just as the id does. The Adult does process reality, just as the ego does.
But Berne asked: What does this look like when it's actually happening between people? How do these internal structures manifest in observable transactions? And crucially: Can we teach people to recognise their own ego state shifts and choose different responses?
The answer to that final question—demonstrated through decades of TA practice—is yes. And that's the transformation from psychoanalytic insight to practical tool for change.
The theoretical lineage from Freud through Bowlby to Berne matters because it shows how psychoanalytic insight became observable practice. But theory only earns its place when it illuminates reality. The Changing People case studies—particularly Angie's experiences in Part 1 (Young, 2025) and the systemic dynamics in Part 4 (Young, 2025)—provide a laboratory for recognising transactional patterns that frontline workers encounter daily.
What follows isn't comprehensive TA training (consult Berne's Games People Play (1964) and Stewart & Joines's TA Today (1987) for that). Instead, it's pattern recognition—identifying specific ego states, transaction types, and games playing out in the case material you've already encountered.
Part 1: Kelly Jokden's Performance
In Part 1, Kelly Jokden "knows exactly what to say in meetings, attends appointments when on Child Protection plans, completes parenting courses without implementing anything." This is textbook Adapted Child—the ego state that learned to survive authority figures by appearing compliant whilst changing nothing substantive. Kelly hasn't internalised programme content; she's performing submission to parental authority (now represented by professionals).
When she "genuinely believes she's a good mother" despite observable dysfunction, we see the Free Child's spontaneous beliefs protected by Adapted Child's strategic performance. The two sub-states of Child work in concert: genuine feeling (Free) masked by strategic compliance (Adapted).
Part 4: Angie in the Car Park
Angie sitting in her car after supervision, unable to return inside, shows the collision between Adult recognition of impossibility and Adapted Child compliance with system demands. Her Adult knows: "I've never changed anyone." Her Adapted Child must type: "Through intensive support and consistent engagement, Martin Hakdson has achieved fundamental changes..."
The moral injury comes from being forced to suppress Adult awareness and operate from Adapted Child—producing the compliance narrative the system demands whilst knowing it's false.
Part 1: Marcus's Dual Roles
Team Manager Marcus "shields the team from perhaps 70% of senior management pressure" (Nurturing Parent protecting his children/team) whilst simultaneously delivering impossible targets (Critical Parent enforcing superego demands). He operates from both Parent sub-states depending on whether he's facing upward (receiving Critical Parent from seniors, passing it down) or downward (protecting team with Nurturing Parent).
This is Berne's insight: the same person shifts ego states based on transaction context. Marcus isn't inconsistent—he's responding from different internal structures to different relational demands.
A critical insight connecting attachment theory to transactional analysis concerns the relationship between stress and functioning. Both Bowlby's attachment framework and Berne's ego state model recognise that adaptive functioning depends on manageable stress levels. When stress is low or well-regulated, individuals can access Adult ego states and maintain secure attachment behaviours. Under high, unmanaged stress, more primitive patterns emerge—whether conceptualised as insecure attachment strategies or regressive ego states (Schore, 2003).
This stress-regulation dynamic pervades the case studies in ways that illuminate both family and professional dysfunction.
Part 4: Katie Pakden's Morning Paralysis
Katie Pakden's inability to get out of bed—"when they go off, my body won't move. It's like I'm paralysed"—illustrates stress overwhelming adaptive capacity. Her Adult knows the children need to get to school. Her Nurturing Parent wants to care for them. But chronic stress (poverty, partner's arrests, intergenerational trauma) has dysregulated her nervous system to the point where alarm clocks trigger freeze response rather than action.
This isn't "resistance to change" or "choosing not to engage." It's a stress-dysregulated nervous system unable to access the ego states required for school-morning functioning. The system's demand that she "just engage properly" misunderstands that engagement requires a regulated nervous system capable of Adult processing—precisely what chronic stress destroys (Perry & Winfrey, 2021).
Part 1: Marcus Under Pressure
Marcus "shields the team from perhaps 70% of senior management pressure" when functioning from Adult and Nurturing Parent. But Part 1 notes that "supervision becomes task-focused under pressure, development discussions vanishing." Under stress, Marcus loses access to Nurturing Parent and Adult, defaulting to Critical Parent enforcement of compliance.
This isn't Marcus choosing to be a poor manager—it's stress overwhelming his capacity to maintain containing ego states. His own nervous system, flooded with cortisol from impossible demands above and team needs below, regresses to the most primitive managerial stance: control and enforcement.
Part 4: Angie's Moral Injury as Chronic Stress
Part 4's description of Angie in the car park—"The physical sensation starts in her chest—that familiar tightness that's become her constant companion. Her jaw aches from unconscious clenching. Her shoulders feel like concrete"—shows a nervous system in chronic stress state. This isn't burnout (which rest can fix). It's a stress-damaged system losing capacity to regulate between ego states.
Notice her functioning deterioration: she "can't quite make herself go back inside" after supervision. Her Adult recognises the impossible bind, but stress prevents accessing Adult responses. Instead, she oscillates between Adapted Child (must comply) and Free Child (wants to escape), unable to sustain the Adult processing that might enable strategic adaptation.
The moral injury deepens because she recognises her ego state deregulation whilst being unable to prevent it. Knowledge without capacity for intervention—perhaps the most painful form of professional awareness.
Part 1: Tom Hakdson's Protective Boundaries
Tom "leaves at 5pm exactly, never takes work home" despite team resentment. Through a stress-regulation lens, Tom has recognised that his nervous system requires strict work-life boundaries to maintain Adult functioning. His "rigid boundaries" aren't coldness—they're sophisticated stress management that preserves his capacity to access appropriate ego states during working hours.
The team's resentment reveals their own stress-compromised judgment. From Adult, they might recognise Tom's boundaries as good practice. But their stress-dysregulated states (oscillating between Adapted Child compliance and resentful Child rebellion) prevent accessing Adult appreciation.
The Kelly Jokden Paradox: Performance Under Pressure
Kelly Jokden's perfect performance—"knows exactly what to say in meetings, attends appointments when on Child Protection plans"—appears to contradict the stress-deregulation pattern. But this is Adapted Child functioning at its most sophisticated: a stress response pattern learned early (probably through childhood survival in punitive environments) that deploys compliance performance as a stress-regulation strategy.
Kelly's stress response isn't freeze (like Katie) or fight (like some families). It's fawn—performing perfect compliance to reduce threat. This works brilliantly for system navigation but prevents accessing Adult processing that might enable genuine adaptation. Her nervous system has learned that survival requires performance, not authenticity.
Attachment Styles as Stress-Response Patterns
Ainsworth's attachment classifications can be understood as different stress-response strategies that shape available ego states under pressure (Ainsworth et al., 1978):
The Thomkden family's "dangerous dysfunction" mentioned in Part 1 likely reflects disorganised attachment in both parents, producing unpredictable ego state shifts that make them impossible to work with safely. Under stress, father Dean might oscillate rapidly between Critical Parent rage, Adapted Child victimhood, and Free Child impulsivity—no stable pattern the system can engage.
Systemic Stress Amplification
Part 4 reveals how stress cascades through organisational levels, deregulating ego states at every tier:
Each level's stress deregulation increases stress at the next level. The system becomes a stress-amplification machine, progressively destroying everyone's capacity for Adult functioning whilst demanding increasingly complex Adult responses.
Why This Matters: The Impossibility of "Just Engage"
Understanding stress-ego state dynamics reveals why exhortations to "engage properly," "commit to change," or "take responsibility" are neurologically illiterate. These demands require Adult functioning that stress has made unavailable. Asking Katie Pakden to "just attend the parenting programme" whilst her nervous system is chronically dysregulated is like asking someone with a broken leg to "just walk properly."
The cruelty compounds when failure to engage under unbearable stress gets documented as "resistance" or "lack of motivation," justifying intensified intervention that increases stress further, ensuring continued deregulation. The system creates the dysfunction it claims to address.
Berne's framework becomes most valuable when integrated with attachment theory's stress-regulation insights. Ego states aren't just communication stances—they're stress-dependent capacities that collapse under pressure in patterns shaped by early attachment experiences. Recognising this doesn't solve the impossibility, but it shifts understanding from moral failure to biological constraint.
Complementary Transactions: The System's Demand
Part 4 shows the political system speaking Critical Parent to professionals: "transform these families." The system expects Adapted Child responses: "we'll try harder." This complementary transaction (Parent-Child / Child-Parent) can continue indefinitely—which is exactly what maintains the dysfunctional system.
Tom Hakdson refusing this pattern ("leaves at 5pm exactly, never takes work home") breaks the complementary transaction. He responds from Adult: "these are my contracted hours." The system experiences this as crossed transaction—expected Child compliance, received Adult boundary. Result: "team resents and envies him equally."
Crossed Transactions: When Truth Emerges
Katie Pakden attempting Adult communication—"I don't know why I can't do mornings"—crosses the expected transaction. The system addresses her from Critical Parent ("you must engage"), expecting Adapted Child ("I'll try harder"). She responds from Adult ("I genuinely cannot"). This honesty gets documented as "resistance"—punishment for crossing the expected transaction pattern.
Compare with Kelly Jokden's complementary transaction maintenance: receives Critical Parent demands, responds with perfect Adapted Child compliance. Communication flows smoothly (though achieving nothing) because the transaction pattern is complementary.
Ulterior Transactions: The Hidden Level
Part 4 reveals ulterior transactions throughout. Social level: "We're here to help your family" (Adult-Adult). Psychological level: "We're here to assess your competence and document your failures" (Critical Parent-Adapted Child).
Families pick up the psychological level instantly. This is why Katie Pakden cries "they promise help but nothing changes"—she's responding to the ulterior message, not the social one. The Jokden family's performance suggests they've mastered reading ulterior transactions and responding strategically to both levels simultaneously.
Berne's concept of psychological games—predictable sequences of ulterior transactions leading to familiar payoffs—illuminates the system's perpetual dysfunction.
"I'm Only Trying to Help" (IOTH)
Part 4's entire professional system plays IOTH. The game requires:
1. Helper offers assistance from apparent Adult or Nurturing Parent
2. Recipient accepts or rejects help
3. Help fails (because it was never genuine Adult help, but Critical Parent control)
4. Helper claims moral superiority: "I tried to help, they wouldn't engage"
The payoff: helper maintains superior position whilst avoiding responsibility for ineffective help. Director Pat, politicians, even Angie herself all play variants of IOTH. The game is endemic because it protects everyone's position whilst achieving nothing.
"Why Don't You—Yes But" (YDYB)
Kelly Jokden plays perfect YDYB. Professional suggests intervention (Critical Parent advice). Kelly agrees enthusiastically (Adapted Child compliance). Kelly doesn't implement (because the game's point isn't change, it's maintaining the transactional pattern). Professional suggests another intervention. Repeat indefinitely.
The payoff for Kelly: proves she's trying whilst maintaining status quo. The payoff for the professional: avoids confronting the impossibility of creating change by staying busy offering solutions.
"Kick Me"
Part 4 shows the system playing Kick Me with workers. Set impossible targets (transform families). Provide insufficient resources. Document inevitable failure. Blame workers for "practice issues." The payoff: system avoids examining its impossible demands by locating fault in worker competence.
Angie's moral injury comes from recognising she's trapped in this game but must continue playing to maintain employment.
Berne's framework extends beyond individual transactions to organisational patterns. Part 1's description of endless restructures shows institutional Adapted Child—appearing to change (compliant response to political pressure) whilst maintaining core dysfunction.
The "Service Development" arriving every 2.5 years follows YDYB at organisational scale. Problem identified (services inadequate). Solution proposed (restructure). Solution fails (because structure wasn't the problem). New problem identified. New solution. The game continues because it satisfies political demands for "action" without requiring actual effectiveness.
Berne's revolutionary insight was that recognising your ego state in the moment enables choosing different responses. You cannot change your internal Parent (those voices are fixed from childhood experience) or your Child (those patterns are neurologically embedded). But you can choose which ego state you speak from in any given transaction.
Tom Hakdson demonstrates this. He hasn't eliminated his Adapted Child (the part that wants to please authority, fears criticism). He's learned to recognise when it's activated and consciously choose Adult responses instead: "these are my contracted hours." The team's resentment comes from watching him do what they cannot—choose Adult when the system demands Adapted Child compliance.
Sarah Mitqden job-hunting represents recognition without yet achieving choice. She recognises the game ("I'm being asked to launder impossibility into change receipts") but hasn't found a way to choose differently within the system. Her choice is exit rather than adaptation.
Part 4's closing image—Angie driving home knowing she'll return tomorrow despite recognising the impossible bind—shows awareness without choice. She sees the transactional patterns, identifies the games, recognises her Adapted Child compliance with Critical Parent demands. But structural coercion (need employment, families need witnesses) prevents choosing differently.
This is Berne's framework applied not as individual therapy but as systemic analysis. When entire organisations operate from games, when political structures demand complementary transactions, when professional survival requires Adapted Child compliance, individual recognition may not enable individual choice. The system's transactional patterns coerce participation.
Eric Berne's Transactional Analysis represents the culmination of psychology's transformation from Freud's speculative intrapsychic model to an empirically grounded, observable framework for understanding human interaction. Through Klein's relational turn, Bowlby's attachment revolution, and Sullivan's interpersonal focus, the field moved from unverifiable unconscious processes to measurable relationship patterns.
Berne's genius was synthesis—taking these diverse streams and creating a practical tool that frontline workers could use in real time. The Parent-Adult-Child model isn't a simplification of Freud; it's a translation of psychoanalytic insight into observable communication stances. The concept of transactions isn't a rejection of depth psychology; it's recognition that internal structures manifest in interpersonal patterns.
Applied to the realities of family support work documented in the Changing People series, TA illuminates why well-intentioned interventions so often fail. The system operates through games like "I'm Only Trying to Help," demanding complementary Parent-Child transactions that maintain dysfunction whilst appearing to address it. Workers caught between political demands for transformation and evolutionary impossibilities experience moral injury not from individual failure but from structural coercion into harmful patterns.
Yet recognition enables possibility. Understanding ego states allows professionals to choose Adult responses even when systems demand Adapted Child compliance. Identifying games creates space to refuse participation. Recognising crossed transactions explains communication breakdowns that get mislabelled as family resistance.
Berne didn't promise that awareness would transform systems—he was too empirical for such fantasy. But he demonstrated that making the unconscious observable, translating internal structures into interaction patterns, and naming games reduces their power. Not through change—that remains as impossible as ever—but through adaptation: choosing different responses within constraints that cannot be eliminated.
The journey from Freud's Viennese consulting room to Berne's group therapy sessions to Angie's car park in Midkwell represents psychology growing up—moving from speculation to science, from individual analysis to systemic understanding, from promising transformation to supporting adaptation.
For frontline workers navigating impossible demands, this lineage matters. You're not failing when families don't transform—you're recognising evolutionary reality. You're not inadequate when games persist—you're witnessing structural dysfunction. You're not alone when moral injury deepens—you're experiencing the collision between political fantasy and biological fact.
Berne gave us language for what we already knew but couldn't say. That's the gift of theory done well: not telling us something new, but helping us recognise what we've always seen.
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of Attachment: A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Berne, E. (1961). Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy: A Systematic Individual and Social Psychiatry. Grove Press.
Berne, E. (1964). Games People Play: The Psychology of Human Relationships. Grove Press.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.
Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and Anger. Basic Books.
Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 3. Loss: Sadness and Depression. Basic Books.
Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1952). Psychoanalytic Studies of the Personality. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Freud, S. (1900). The Interpretation of Dreams. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud (Vols. 4-5). Hogarth Press.
Freud, S. (1905). Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 7, pp. 125-245). Hogarth Press.
Freud, S. (1923). The Ego and the Id. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 19, pp. 3-66). Hogarth Press.
Holmes, J. (1993). John Bowlby and Attachment Theory. Routledge.
Klein, M. (1932). The Psycho-Analysis of Children. Hogarth Press.
Klein, M. (1946). Notes on some schizoid mechanisms. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 27, 99-110.
Perry, B. D., & Winfrey, O. (2021). What Happened to You? Conversations on Trauma, Resilience, and Healing. Flatiron Books.
Schore, A. N. (2003). Affect Regulation and the Repair of the Self. W. W. Norton & Company.
Sroufe, L. A., Egeland, B., Carlson, E. A., & Collins, W. A. (2005). The Development of the Person: The Minnesota Study of Risk and Adaptation from Birth to Adulthood. Guilford Press.
Stewart, I., & Joines, V. (1987). TA Today: A New Introduction to Transactional Analysis. Lifespace Publishing.
Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The Interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry. W. W. Norton & Company.
Sullivan, H. S. (1954). The Psychiatric Interview. W. W. Norton & Company.
Winnicott, D. W. (1960). The theory of the parent-infant relationship. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 41, 585-595.
Winnicott, D. W. (1965). The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment: Studies in the Theory of Emotional Development. International Universities Press.
Young, S. (2025). Freud's Structural Model for Frontline Family Support: Understanding the Id, Ego, and Superego in Contemporary Practice. YoungFamilyLife Essays. Retrieved from link
Young, S. (2025). The Impossible Task of Changing People PART 1: Changing People: A Psychological Impossibility. YoungFamilyLife Essays. Retrieved from link
Young, S. (2025). When Helping Hurts: The Professional's Dilemma PART 4: Changing People: A Psychological Impossibility. YoungFamilyLife Essays. Retrieved from link
Topics: #TransactionalAnalysis #EgoStates #DevelopmentalPsychology #AttachmentTheory #FamilySupport #ProfessionalDevelopment #PsychologicalTheory #YoungFamilyLife
© 2025 Steve Young and YoungFamilyLife Ltd. All rights reserved.
This essay was developed collaboratively using AI assistance to research academic sources and refine content structure, while maintaining the author's original voice, insights, and "Information Without Instruction" philosophy. No part of this essay may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the copyright holders, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law.
For permission requests, contact: info@youngfamilylife.com