Understanding the Dance of Reciprocity and the importance of endings in relationships
The ways we manage transitions and endings in relationships are as important as our capacity for joy and connection. The Solihull Approach conceptualises this as the Dance of Reciprocity—a rhythmic, back-and-forth process that underpins not only child development but the emotional health of all relationships throughout life. Understanding where we struggle in the dance—and how to become better equipped—offers a practical, compassionate pathway for parents, carers, and professionals alike.
Martin has just secured a fantastic new job—a rewarding achievement built on years of hard work. Beneath his satisfaction, though, lies an unexpected sadness. He'll miss many of his colleagues and would like to keep in touch with some. But the thought of a big leaving do fills him with dread. Not wanting a fuss, Martin quietly asks his manager to keep his news quiet. Only on the day before his departure does he let his team know, leaving no time for a proper send-off. In the end, just a handful gather at the pub; some can't even make it. Martin slips away with a vague sense of relief mingled with regret, and later wonders why his goodbye felt so unsatisfying—for him and for those he left behind.
The awkwardness that Martin feels at the idea of a public leaving do is far from unusual. In everyday life, difficulties at the "end of peak" or closing phase of interactions ripple into multiple contexts:
Martin's story acts as a window into these broader struggles—when endings feel like something to be survived or avoided, opportunities for closure and affirmation are lost for everyone involved. As we explore in our companion essay on stress and memory, when our brain perceives threat or overwhelming pressure, the limbic system can hijack our best intentions, making natural transitions feel dangerous rather than satisfying.
Understanding the universality of these struggles becomes clearer when we explore them beyond work farewells. Three additional examples, drawn from daily life and parenting, illustrate how transitions are negotiated—or mishandled—in many everyday situations.
After an exuberant dinner party, Emma notices her guests yawning and glancing at their watches. Worrying that ending the evening might seem rude, she offers more drinks and snacks, attempting to revive the night's peak excitement. Instead, the gathering fizzles out in a trickle, with guests leaving awkwardly rather than in the warm group farewell Emma hoped for. She is left both exhausted and dissatisfied, unable to pinpoint why something so joyful ended on a flat note.
James, immersed in imaginative games with his six-year-old son Leo, struggles to spot when Leo needs to rest or shift activity. Attempting to stave off the game's ending—believing more is merrier—he initiates new scenarios and rounds. Leo, however, becomes disengaged and cranky, sometimes abruptly withdrawing or even having a meltdown. James is perplexed as to why their fun nearly always ends in discord.
Maria and her daughter Sophie, aged five, reach the peak of delight building a 'jungle adventure' together. Abruptly, Maria checks the time and, feeling the pressure of dinner preparations, ends the play with "Right, you go and play or watch TV while I make dinner." With no winding down or guidance into a new activity, Sophie soon gets into trouble—teasing the cat, tearing puzzle books, clinging in the kitchen, or simply crying. Maria, frustrated, cannot fathom the shift from laughter to upset.
Research in child development and attachment supports what these examples illustrate: our ability to navigate endings, transitions, and closures is largely learned in the first years of life. As the Solihull Approach highlights, skills for handling the "deceleration" and "withdrawal" phases of the Dance of Reciprocity develop through repeated, sensitive care—moments when carers support winding down, say clear goodbyes, and model emotional containment.
When adults lack these skills, the gaps emerge not only in childhood but throughout adult life—in social events, work tasks, and parenting moments alike. Understanding how stress responses can shut down our thinking brain (as explored in our companion essay on brain function under pressure) helps explain why endings can feel so threatening and why our nervous system sometimes chooses avoidance over completion.
The Solihull Parenting Approach, widely adopted in the UK and internationally, is built on three interlocking pillars:
The model emphasises that true attunement is not just about joining in the highs, but skilfully guiding and containing both peaks and endings. Without this, children (and adults) may feel lost, unregulated, or unacknowledged in their "come-downs" from excitement.
To understand where things go wrong—and how to develop better skills—we need to map the full choreography of reciprocal interaction. The Dance of Reciprocity unfolds through seven distinct stages:
Now that we understand the full choreography, let's revisit our examples to see exactly where the dance broke down—and how these patterns might feel familiar.
Emma and her guests moved beautifully through Initiation to Peak of Excitement—everyone fully engaged, laughter flowing, wonderful connection achieved. But as the evening naturally entered Deceleration, Emma couldn't read the signals. The yawning and watch-glancing weren't rudeness; they were her guests' way of saying "This has been wonderful, and now we're ready for Withdrawal/Turning Away." By offering more drinks, Emma was essentially trying to drag everyone back to stage 4 (Acceleration) when what was needed was gentle support for stages 6 and 7. The result? An ending that satisfied no one.
James and Leo's imaginative play flowed naturally through stages 1-5. Initiation through playful invitation, building Attention and Acceleration through shared stories, reaching genuine Peaks of Excitement together. But when Leo began showing Deceleration cues—becoming quieter, less responsive, needing breaks—James couldn't see them. His instinct was to reignite the excitement, to prevent the natural Withdrawal/Turning Away that Leo needed. Leo's meltdowns weren't evidence of a difficult child; they were his only way to force the ending that should have happened naturally.
Maria and Sophie's jungle adventure reached a beautiful Peak of Excitement—pure connection and shared imagination. But when reality intruded (dinner time), Maria jumped straight from stage 5 to an abrupt stage 7, skipping Deceleration entirely. Sophie needed time to wind down, to process what they'd shared, to gradually withdraw from their imaginary world. Instead, she was thrust into immediate disconnection with no bridge between peak excitement and separation. Her subsequent acting out wasn't defiance—it was dysregulation from a dance left incomplete.
Martin's workplace departure reveals perhaps the most telling pattern. Rather than risk the vulnerability of stages 6 and 7—the Deceleration of a public farewell and the Withdrawal/Turning Away of genuine goodbyes—he chose to avoid the dance altogether. His quiet exit protected him from the discomfort he anticipated, but it also denied him and his colleagues the closure and affirmation that a complete dance provides. This same pattern likely plays out in Martin's personal relationships: quick departures, avoided goodbyes, relationships that end with a whimper rather than proper completion.
Awkwardness or avoidance around the end of interactions is sometimes attributed to neurodiversity (Autism Spectrum Disorder, ADHD). Yet, the evidence and clinical experience emphasise a broader perspective: relational deficits can span generations, as parents model what they themselves received. A grandparent who struggled with goodbyes may unconsciously pass this discomfort through the family, transmitting a pattern of abrupt, avoided, or over-extended endings.
Within this framework, being "unequipped" for the full Dance of Reciprocity is not a personal failing, but an opportunity for growth—for individuals, families, and communities alike.
Here lies perhaps the most important insight: our early experiences in relationships are so powerful that the underlying patterns they create may be impossible to fundamentally shift. If you learned early that endings are dangerous, overwhelming, or to be avoided, that learning runs deep—deeper than conscious thought, embedded in the nervous system itself.
But as adults, we can adapt. We can develop strategies that work with and around our engrained responses rather than fighting them. This means learning to go against what feels "natural" in the moment, because what feels natural to us may be precisely what needs changing. This embodies the principle of Feed the Solution, Starve the Problem—instead of focusing on what's wrong with our endings, we build new pathways for what we want to see.
If you recognise yourself in these examples, consider that your struggle with stages 6 and 7 may be adaptive responses learned long ago. Rather than expecting to suddenly feel comfortable with endings, you might:
The goal isn't to rewire decades of learning overnight. It's to develop conscious competence in areas where your unconscious patterns might be unhelpful. This is adaptation, not transformation—working intelligently with who you are rather than demanding you become someone else. Feed the Solution, Starve the Problem: focus your energy on building the completion skills you want rather than fighting the avoidance patterns you don't.
So, how do we move from awkwardness or avoidance to skill and confidence in handling transitions and closure? Being "equipped to play"—and to relate—means intentionally developing strategies that work with our patterns rather than against them.
In making endings as deliberate and nurturing as beginnings, we build relationships capable of weathering change with resilience and warmth. Feed the Solution, Starve the Problem: every positive ending experience strengthens the neural pathways for satisfying closure rather than anxious avoidance.
Whether in boardrooms, kitchens, playgrounds, or family living rooms, the closing measures of the Dance of Reciprocity matter. By recognising where the dance falters—and being willing to learn new steps—parents and adults can transform endings from points of tension into moments of connection and growth. This is not only a gift to the children in our care but a profound act of self-compassion and intergenerational healing.
© 2025 Steve Young and YoungFamilyLife Ltd. All rights reserved.
This essay was developed collaboratively using AI assistance to research academic sources and refine content structure, while maintaining the author's original voice, insights, and "Information Without Instruction" philosophy. No part of this essay may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the copyright holders, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law.
For permission requests, contact: info@youngfamilylife.com